Supreme Court: Challenges to a Conviction Belong in § 2255, Not Compassionate Release
Fernandez v. United States holds that claims a conviction is invalid, including innocence-type arguments, are not extraordinary and compelling reasons.
News
Fernandez v. United States holds that claims a conviction is invalid, including innocence-type arguments, are not extraordinary and compelling reasons.
In Rutherford v. United States, the Court held that a sentencing change Congress did not make retroactive cannot be an extraordinary and compelling reason.
In 2021, the Fifth Circuit threw out a denial of compassionate release in United States v. Cooper and told the lower court to look again.
In 2021, a Texas federal judge cut a man’s 1,117-month stacked robbery sentence to 397 months through compassionate release after 27 years served.
In Wong Chi Fai, a federal court granted release to a man with terminal cancer even though surgery might have helped him live past 18 months.
An Arizona federal judge granted compassionate release to an 81-year-old man after prosecutors took no position. Here is what helped and what it means for you.
In U.S. v. Ingram, an Ohio federal court denied compassionate release but recommended moving the prisoner to a reentry center near his sick mother.
In U.S. v. Fox, a Maine federal court said judges, not the BOP Director, decide what counts as an extraordinary and compelling reason for release.
Federal only
If your loved one is seriously ill, elderly, or needed at home, book a consultation. We'll listen, tell you whether we can help, and explain what comes next.
Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information you send before we agree to represent you may not be confidential.