Does rehabilitation help with compassionate release?

Originally published March 17, 2021. Statements about the law were updated in October 2026; the box below gives today’s rules.

What the law says now (October 2026). A federal judge can reduce a sentence for “extraordinary and compelling” reasons (reasons that are especially unusual and convincing). You must first ask the warden in writing. You can file in court 30 days after the warden gets the request, or sooner if you finish the Bureau of Prisons’ appeals (18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)). The judge also weighs the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See who may seek compassionate release.

Changes in sentencing law. In Rutherford v. United States (May 28, 2026), the Supreme Court held that when Congress makes a sentencing change non-retroactive (meaning it does not apply to people already sentenced), such as the First Step Act’s end of “stacked” § 924(c) sentences, the gap between an old sentence and today’s sentence cannot be an “extraordinary and compelling” reason, alone or combined with other reasons. Some older posts here describe court wins on that theory; those wins are history, not today’s law.
Rehabilitation. By law, rehabilitation alone is not an extraordinary and compelling reason (28 U.S.C. § 994(t)). It can be weighed together with other reasons (U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(d)).
COVID-19 and outbreaks. Today a court looks at whether the prison is affected, or at imminent risk of being affected, by an ongoing infectious disease outbreak or public health emergency, and whether the person faces a higher risk of severe illness or death that cannot be reduced in time (U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(1)(D)).
The Sentencing Commission’s policy statement. Since November 1, 2023, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 applies to motions filed by prisoners as well as by the Bureau of Prisons, and a reduction must be consistent with it (18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)). Posts from 2020–2023 that say courts were “not bound” by it describe the law before that date. Rutherford (2026) held the policy statement invalid to the extent it lets a non-retroactive change in law count as a reason.

Compassionate release allows early release from prison

Rehabilitation can help a compassionate release request, but it is not enough by itself. The law says rehabilitation alone is not an “extraordinary and compelling” reason, though it can count together with other reasons.

How rehabilitation fits into early release

Families often ask what role rehabilitation in prison plays in compassionate release. Compassionate release has always been rare. But the First Step Act of 2018 opened new paths to relief. At the time this article was written, more than 2,000 compassionate releases had been granted since the law passed.

Part of that came from a little-known change to the criteria for federal compassionate release. Rehabilitation can support a request, but by law, rehabilitation alone is not an “extraordinary and compelling” reason (28 U.S.C. § 994(t)), though it can count together with other reasons (U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(d)).

What compassionate release is

Compassionate release is a process for people in federal prison. It lets them ask for immediate release for medical or humanitarian reasons.

In 2021, some courts allowed compassionate release requests based on how long a sentence was or how it was structured. That changed in 2026: the Supreme Court held in Rutherford v. United States (May 28, 2026) that a gap caused by a change in sentencing law that Congress did not make retroactive (did not apply to people already sentenced) cannot be an “extraordinary and compelling” reason, alone or combined with other reasons. Some courts once treated sentencing structures such as 924(c) “stacking” as extraordinary and compelling. The Supreme Court rejected that view in Rutherford v. United States (May 28, 2026).

Why rehabilitation still matters

Think about the long-term value of rehabilitation for a person in prison.

A long sentence can be time wasted or time invested. Department of Justice numbers put the recidivism rate (the rate of people returning to crime) at about 65%. For people in the highest criminal history category, it rises to nearly 80% (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2017). So rehabilitation may also lower a person’s chance of going back to prison. After all, what good is a sentence reduction if the person ends up back in prison soon after?

Rehabilitation can be part of the path to freedom. At the time this article was written, courts had already pointed to these efforts when granting early release. Even more important, the work a person puts into rehabilitation keeps paying off after release. The DOJ recidivism numbers show the opposite is also true.

How the First Step Act affects early release

The First Step Act gives people in prison faster access to the courts. A person can go to court once 30 days have passed after filing their first request with the warden. And anyone who believes they have extraordinary and compelling reasons may submit a request.

If you believe you have extraordinary and compelling reasons for early release, the first step is to send a formal request to the warden asking for compassionate release. This step is critical, so the request should be thorough and complete.

Thirty days after the warden receives the request, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) allows a motion to be filed in court, even if the warden has not answered. It can be filed sooner if the Bureau of Prisons’ appeals are finished first.

Image by Public Co from Pixabay

If you want help with a compassionate release request, book a consultation.